CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Goodenia pusilliflora

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 7, 2023
Entity authorityQ17480094 ↗
Source-derived summary

Goodenia pusilliflora, commonly known as small-flower goodenia, is a species of flowering plant in the family Goodeniaceae and is endemic to drier parts of southern Australia. It is a low-lying to ascending herb with oblong to egg-shaped leaves with toothed or lyrate edges, and racemes of small yellow flowers.

Description

Goodenia pusilliflora is a low-lying to ascending herb with stems up to 20 cm (7.9 in) long. The leaves at the base of the plant are oblong to egg-shaped, sometimes narrow lance-shaped with the narrower end towards the base, 15–80 mm (0.59–3.15 in) long and 5–15 mm (0.20–0.59 in) wide, with toothed to lyrate edges. The flowers are arranged in racemes up to 200 mm (7.9 in) long with leaf-like bracts, each flower on a pedicel 10–70 mm (0.39–2.76 in) long. The sepals are elliptic, about 2 mm (0.079 in) long and the corolla is yellow, 5–7 mm (0.20–0.28 in) long and hairy towards the centre. The lower lobes of the corolla are about 2 mm (0.079 in) long with wings 1–1.5 mm (0.039–0.059 in) wide. Flowering mainly occurs from July to October and the fruit is a slightly flattened spherical capsule, 5–6 mm (0.20–0.24 in) long.

Taxonomy and naming

Goodenia pusilliflora was first formally described in 1888 by Ferdinand von Mueller in The Victorian Naturalist.

In 1990, Roger Charles Carolin selected the specimens collected at the junction of the Murray and Darling Rivers collected by Charlotte Holding as the lectotype.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Goodenia pusilliflora” as species of plant. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Goodenia, pusilliflora and species.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1888, 1990—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Goodenia, pusilliflora and species providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Goodenia pusilliflora”, the useful work is to connect “species of plant” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 7, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q17480094. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1888 and 1990.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Goodenia pusilliflora”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Goodenia pusilliflora primary sources, Goodenia pusilliflora archive and Goodenia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Goodenia pusilliflora”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Goodenia pusilliflora” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.