Goldman–Hodgkin–Katz flux equation
expression of the ionic flux across a cell membrane

The Goldman–Hodgkin–Katz flux equation (or GHK flux equation or GHK current density equation) describes the ionic flux across a cell membrane as a function of the transmembrane potential and the concentrations of the ion inside and outside of the cell. Since both the voltage and the concentration gradients influence the movement of ions, this process is a simplified version of electrodiffusion. Electrodiffusion is most accurately defined by the Nernst–Planck equation and the GHK flux equation is a solution to the Nernst–Planck equation with the assumptions listed below.
Origin
The American David E. Goldman of Columbia University, and the English Nobel laureates Alan Lloyd Hodgkin and Bernard Katz derived this equation.
Assumptions
Several assumptions are made in deriving the GHK flux equation (Hille 2001, p. 445) :
The membrane is a homogeneous substance
The electrical field is constant so that the transmembrane potential varies linearly across the membrane
The ions access the membrane instantaneously from the intra- and extracellular solutions
The permeant ions do not interact
The movement of ions is affected by both concentration and voltage differences
Equation
The GHK flux equation for an ion S (Hille 2001, p. 445):
Φ
S
=
P
S
z
S
2
V
m
F
2
R
T
[
S
]
i
−
[
S
]
o
exp
(
−
z
S
V
m
F
/
R
T
)
1
−
exp
(
−
z
S
V
m
F
/
R
T
)
{\displaystyle \Phi _{S}=P_{S}z_{S}^{2}{\frac {V_{m}F^{2}}{RT}}{\frac {[{\mbox{S}}]_{i}-[{\mbox{S}}]_{o}\exp(-z_{S}V_{m}F/RT)}{1-\exp(-z_{S}V_{m}F/RT)}}}
where
Φ
{\displaystyle \Phi }
S is the current density (flux) outward through the membrane carried by ion S, measured in amperes per square meter (A·m−2)
PS is the permeability of the membrane for ion S measured in m·s−1
zS is the valence of ion S
Vm is the transmembrane potential in volts
F is the Faraday constant, equal to 96,485 C·mol−1 or J·V−1·mol−1
R is the gas constant, equal to 8.314 J·K−1·mol−1
T is the absolute temperature, measured in kelvins (= degrees Celsius + 273.15)
[S]i is the intracellular concentration of ion S, measured in mol·m−3 or mmol·l−1
[S]o is the extracellular concentration of ion S, measured in mol·m−3
Implicit definition of reversal potential
The reversal potential is shown to be contained in the GHK flux equation (Flax 2008). The proof is replicated from the reference (Flax 2008) here.
We wish to show that when the flux is zero, the transmembrane potential is not zero. Formally it is written
lim
Φ
S
→
0
V
m
≠
0
{\displaystyle \lim _{\Phi _{S}\rightarrow 0}V_{m}\neq 0}
which is equivalent to writing
lim
V
m
→
0
Φ
S
≠
0
{\displaystyle \lim _{V_{m}\rightarrow 0}\Phi _{S}\neq 0}
, which states that when the transmembrane potential is zero, the flux is not zero.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Goldman–Hodgkin–Katz flux equation” is expression of the ionic flux across a cell membrane. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Goldman, Hodgkin and Katz, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “expression of the ionic flux across a cell membrane” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 9, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5513417. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2001 and 2008.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Goldman–Hodgkin–Katz flux equation”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Goldman–Hodgkin–Katz flux equation primary sources, Goldman–Hodgkin–Katz flux equation archive and Goldman research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Goldman–Hodgkin–Katz flux equation”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Goldman–Hodgkin–Katz flux equation” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.