CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Goff–Gratch equation

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 10, 2026
Entity authorityQ3433288
Source-derived summary

The Goff–Gratch equation is one (arguably the first reliable in history) amongst many experimental correlations proposed to estimate the saturation water vapor pressure at a given temperature.

Another similar equation based on more recent data is the Arden Buck equation.

Historical note

This equation is named after the authors of the original scientific article who described how to calculate the saturation water vapor pressure above a flat free water surface as a function of temperature (Goff and Gratch, 1946).

According to the Smithsonian Meteorological Tables, the formula was adopted in Resolution 164 of the Twelfth Conference of Directors of the International Meteorological

Organization (Washington, 1947). Goff (1957) later revised his formula, and the latter was recommended for use by the World Meteorological Organization in 1988, with further corrections in 2000.

The Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation a.k.a. CIMO-Guide (WMO-No. 8) contains the much simpler Magnus formula (p.197). For temperatures below ‑45 °C for liquid water or ‑65 °C for ice, the CIMO-Guide recommends formulations from Sonntag (1990,1994).

Experimental correlation

The original Goff–Gratch (1945) experimental correlation reads as follows:

where:

log refers to the logarithm in base 10

e* is the saturation water vapor pressure (hPa)

T is the absolute air temperature in kelvins

Tst is the steam-point (i.e.

Editorial summary

“Goff–Gratch equation” enters the record as open-knowledge reference entry. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Goff, Gratch and equation can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1946, 1947, 1957, 1988—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Goff, Gratch and equation.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Goff–Gratch equation” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Goff, Gratch and equation provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3433288. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1946, 1947, 1957 and 1988.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Goff–Gratch equation”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Goff–Gratch equation primary sources, Goff–Gratch equation archive and Goff research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Goff–Gratch equation”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Goff–Gratch equation” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.