Gods of the Blood
book by Mattias Gardell
Gods of the Blood: The Pagan Revival and White Separatism is a book by Swedish scholar Mattias Gardell discussing neopaganism (in particular Germanic) and its relationship to white separatism, as well as the broader white supremacist right. It was published by Duke University Press in June 2003. Gardell was then an associate professor on history of religion at Stockholm University. The book was based on several years of field work he had conducted among such movements that he undertook during the 1990s, and several interviews with members of those movements. The book received largely positive reviews.
Background and publication history
The book's author was Swedish historian of religion Mattias Gardell, then an associate professor on history of religion at Stockholm University. He had authored previous books on the subject of race and religiosity, including In the Name of Elijah Muhammad about the Nation of Islam in 1996.
In writing the book, Gardell interviewed several members of white supremacist pagan movements. The book is largely based on five years of fieldwork among such movements that he undertook during the 1990s. Gods of the Blood was first published by Duke University Press in June 2003.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Gods of the Blood” as book by Mattias Gardell. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the arts & letters register because the source frames it as book by Mattias Gardell. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Attribution, date and provenance are strongest when supported by the original work, a catalogue record and documented transmission. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5576881. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2003 and 1996.
Later fame can flatten the distinction between original context, subsequent adaptation and institutional collecting history. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.
- Identifying works and editions
- Tracing reception history
- Finding collection records
The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Gods of the Blood”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Gods of the Blood primary sources, Gods of the Blood archive and Gods research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Gods of the Blood”?
- Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
- Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Gods of the Blood” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.