CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

List of minor 2000 AD stories

Wikimedia list article

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 22, 2026
Entity authorityQ6628660
Source-derived summary

2000 AD is a weekly British science fiction-oriented comic magazine first published in 1977, which serialises stories in each issue. Although most noted for its Judge Dredd stories, it has published many others.

Stories

A

Absalom

Absalom is a horror story spin-off from Caballistics, Inc. by Gordon Rennie and Tiernen Trevallion.

The stories were "Noblesse Obligie" in 2000 AD #1732–1739 (May–June 2011), "Sick Leave" in 2000 AD Prog 2012 (December 2011), "Ghosts of London" in 2000 AD #1765–1771 (January–February 2012), "Dirty Postcards" in Prog 2013 (December 2014), "Old Pals' Act" in Prog 2014 (December 2013), "Under a False Flag" in #1934–1942 (June–August 2015), "Family Snapshots" in #1961 (December 2015), and "Terminal Diagnosis" in #2053–2060 and #2136–2143 (October–December 2017 and June–August 2019).

The first trade paperback, Ghosts of London, was published in June 2012 (ISBN 1781080429).

Ampney Crucis Investigates

Ampney Crucis Investigates is an occult detective story by Ian Edginton and Simon Davis starring the fictional investigator Ampney Crucis and his man servant Eddie Cromwell. It started in 2000 AD #1611 (2008) and up to the end of 2011 has spanned four parts.

The first trade paperback, Vile Bodies, was published in January 2012 (ISBN 1907992944).

B

Babe Race 2000

Babe Race 2000 is a story written by Mark Millar, with art by Anthony Williams, which ran in an eponymous story in 2000 AD #883-888 (1994) and a one-off, "Bounty Hunter Mom", in the 1995 2000 AD Yearbook.

Editorial summary

“List of minor 2000 AD stories” enters the record as wikimedia list article. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what List, minor and stories can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2000, 1977, 1732, 1739—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around List, minor and stories.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“List of minor 2000 AD stories” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, List, minor and stories provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6628660. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2000, 1977, 1732 and 1739.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “List of minor 2000 AD stories”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow List of minor 2000 AD stories primary sources, List of minor 2000 AD stories archive and List research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “List of minor 2000 AD stories”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from List of minor 2000 AD stories” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.