CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Gladsaxe SF

Danish 1. Division ice hockey team in Gladsaxe

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 22, 2026
Entity authorityQ1529079 ↗
Source-derived summary

Gladsaxe SF is a former ice hockey team in Gladsaxe, Denmark. They played in the Danish Division 1, the second level of ice hockey in Denmark. The club went bankrupt in 2002.

History

The club was founded in 1959. They won the AL-Bank Ligaen five times in the 1960s and 1970s, and the Danish Division 1 twice in 1987, and 1996.

Editorial summary

“Gladsaxe SF” enters the record as danish 1. Division ice hockey team in Gladsaxe. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Gladsaxe, Danish and Division can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2002, 1959, 1987, 1996—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1959-01-01. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Gladsaxe, Danish and Division.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Gladsaxe SF” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Gladsaxe, Danish and Division provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1529079. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2002, 1959, 1987 and 1996.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Gladsaxe SF”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Gladsaxe SF primary sources, Gladsaxe SF archive and Gladsaxe research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Gladsaxe SF”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Gladsaxe SF” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.