CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Girl Illustrated

defunct British glamour magazine

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 13, 2026
Entity authorityQ5564394 ↗
Source-derived summary

Girl Illustrated was a glamour magazine published in London, England by Plant News Ltd from 1966 to 1977. It was a spin-off of the naturist magazine Health & Efficiency and was notable for its high quality paper and numerous colour photographs.

Katy Manning (a Doctor Who companion) appeared naked with a Dalek prop in the August 1976 issue.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Girl Illustrated” as defunct British glamour magazine. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Girl, Illustrated and defunct.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1966, 1977, 1976—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1966-01-01. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Girl, Illustrated and defunct providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Girl Illustrated”, the useful work is to connect “defunct British glamour magazine” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5564394. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1966, 1977 and 1976.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Girl Illustrated”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Girl Illustrated primary sources, Girl Illustrated archive and Girl research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Girl Illustrated”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Girl Illustrated” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.