CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Michelle Gibson

American dressage rider

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 26, 2026
Entity authorityQ6837042 ↗
Source-derived summary

Michelle Gibson (born February 25, 1969) is an American equestrian. She won a bronze medal in team dressage at the 1996 Summer Olympics in Atlanta, together with Robert Dover, Steffen Peters and Guenter Seidel. She placed fifth in individual dressage at the 1996 Summer Olympics.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Michelle Gibson” is american dressage rider. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Michelle, Gibson and American, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1969, 1996—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1969-01-01. For this dossier, Michelle, Gibson and American is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “american dressage rider” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6837042. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1969 and 1996.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Michelle Gibson”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Michelle Gibson primary sources, Michelle Gibson archive and Michelle research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Michelle Gibson”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Michelle Gibson” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.