CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Gazi Gümüshtigin

second ruler of the Danishmendids

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ20473921
Source-derived summary

Gazi Gümüshtigin (died 1104), also known as Melikgazi Gümüshtigin, was the second ruler of the Danishmendids which his father Danishmend Gazi had founded in central-eastern Anatolia after the Battle of Manzikert.

Biography

He succeeded his father when the father died in 1084. Gümüshtigin used deliberately Byzantine imagery in his coins with one side showing a nimbused Christ and the other a Greek inscription which entitled him as "the great amir" to assert his authority.

During the First Crusade, he was directly on the path of the advancing Crusaders and was on the losing side at the Battle of Dorylaeum in 1097. After the end of the First Crusade, he was able to capture Bohemond I of Antioch in August 1100 and the city of Melitene from its Armenian ruler Gabriel in 1101. The Byzantine emperor Alexios I Komnenos offered Gümüshtigin 260,000 bezants, but the offer fell flat because the Seljuk sultan of Rum was denied a share, starting a conflict between the Danishmendids and the Seljuks of Rum. Bohemond then convinced Gümüshtigin to accept 100,000 bezants which was then raised by his allies so that he was released in May 1103.

Shortly after his capture of Antalya in 1104 from the Byzantines, he died of an illness and the Byzantines recovered the city. Similarly, the Seljuks under Kilij Arslan I were able to take control of Malatya in 1106.

In popular culture

Mehmet Polat appears as a character called "Gümüştekin Bey" in the Turkish TV series Diriliş: Ertuğrul, which is based on Gazi Gümüshtigin.

Editorial summary

“Gazi Gümüshtigin” enters the record as second ruler of the Danishmendids. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Gazi, Gümüshtigin and second can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1104, 1084, 1097, 1100—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Gazi, Gümüshtigin and second.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Gazi Gümüshtigin” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Gazi, Gümüshtigin and second provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q20473921. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1104, 1084, 1097 and 1100.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Gazi Gümüshtigin”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Gazi Gümüshtigin primary sources, Gazi Gümüshtigin archive and Gazi research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Gazi Gümüshtigin”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Gazi Gümüshtigin” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.