CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Ghana–United States Status of Forces Agreement

2018 proposal

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 12, 2026
Entity authorityQ52063004 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Ghana–United States Status of Forces Agreement was a proposal made by the United States Department of Defense to the government of Ghana in 2018. Despite historical cooperation between Ghana and the United States, the proposal was controversial due to concerns (raised primarily by Ghana's National Democratic Congress party) that the agreement would offer undue privileges to the United States, including a particularly controversial section allowing the construction of a United States military base in Ghana. Ghana's President Nana Akufo-Addo, has denied the agreement includes permission to build a military base.

Background

Ghana and the United States of America have had a cordial bilateral relationship since Ghana's independence on 6 March 1957. Ghana has cooperated with the U.S. in a wide variety of fields, including education, aviation, agricultural commodities, telecommunications, defence, economic support, and technical support. It has an extradition treaty with Ghana.

Military cooperation

In 1961, Ghana was the first country in which the United States deployed Peace Corps personnel, after President John F. Kennedy issued an executive order to establish an agency within the Department of State. Since then, the two countries have engaged in joint military cooperation and exchange programs. A recent example of this occurred when Ghanaian military forces, which had trained in jungle warfare for the past four decades, aided the regionally aligned forces of United States Army Africa in a jungle warfare training exercise in the Achiase Military Base in Ghana.

Controversy

The main opposition party in Ghana, the National Democratic Congress, raised concerns that the deal provided one-sided benefits to the United States.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Ghana–United States Status of Forces Agreement” as 2018 proposal. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2018, 1957, 1961—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Ghana, United and States can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as 2018 proposal. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q52063004. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2018, 1957 and 1961.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Ghana–United States Status of Forces Agreement”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Ghana–United States Status of Forces Agreement primary sources, Ghana–United States Status of Forces Agreement archive and Ghana research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ghana–United States Status of Forces Agreement”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Ghana–United States Status of Forces Agreement” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.