Gérard de Dainville
prelate of the Holy Roman Empire

Gérard de Dainville (Girardus de Dainvilla; died 18 June 1378) was a prelate of the Holy Roman Empire from an illustrious family of Artois. He was made bishop of Arras in 1361, although he did not take up his see until 1362, was transferred to the diocese of Thérouanne in 1369 and finally transferred to Cambrai in 1371, solemnly entering the city on 8 May 1372. He is known as bishop Gerard III of Cambrai.
Gérard was born at Dainville to a family related to the counts of Flanders. His brothers were Jean, a knight and maître de l'hôtel to the French kings John II and Charles V; Michel, an archdeacon of Ostrevent in the diocese of Arras, who with Gérard co-founded the Collège de Dainville of the University of Paris; and Nicolas, a canon at Paris, Arras and Avranches, and a penitentiary (1362–67). They were uterine brothers of Philippe de Mézières, with whom Gérard maintained a correspondence.
Before he became a bishop, Gérard was a canon at Notre-Dame de Paris, then an archdeacon at Noyon and a canon again at the basilica of Saint-Quentin. He served as a councillor in the Parlement de Paris.
Acting on behalf of the Emperor Charles IV, Gérard invested Duke Albert I of Bavaria-Straubing with the County of Hainaut. Shortly after, some of Gérard's officers got into a dispute with the cathedral chapter, because they had arrested a free man, Robert de Noyers, one of the cathedral servants.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Gérard de Dainville” as prelate of the Holy Roman Empire. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the history & society register because the source frames it as prelate of the Holy Roman Empire. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 20, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q3124404. VIAF identifies the subject as 49149297. The Library of Congress control number is nr99021827. None of the 2 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1378, 1361, 1362 and 1369.
Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.
- Event chronology
- Institutional context
- Locating named record creators
Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Gérard de Dainville”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Gérard de Dainville primary sources, Gérard de Dainville archive and Gérard research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Gérard de Dainville”?
- Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
- Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Gérard de Dainville” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.