CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Georges Olivet

Swiss Red Cross delegate

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 11, 2025
Entity authorityQ124254215
Source-derived summary

Georges Olivet (19 August 1927 – 13 December 1961) was a Swiss delegate of the International Committee of the Red Cross.

Early life

He was born in Nyon and grew up in Jussy.

Career

After high school, he did an apprenticeship as an electrician and mechanic before doing further training in business. In the early 1950s, Olivet moved to the Belgian Congo working in textile imports.

Georges contacted the ICRC delegate in Léopoldville to offer his services. Following a short trip back to Switzerland, Georges assumed his duties as a delegate in late October, 1960. During the Congo Crisis Olivet provided humanitarian support in his role as an ICRC delegate within the secessionist State of Katanga.

The UN Representative in Katanga George Ivan Smith reported to the UN that Olivet "confirmed" to him that "Katanga military and mercenaries are making use of the Red Cross symbol to protect their military operations against the United Nations."

Death

Olivet and two volunteers, Nicole Vroonen and Styts Smeding, were shot and killed while operating their ambulance during Operation Unokat on 13 December 1961. The results of a joint UN-International Red Cross investigation of the incident and the identity of their killers were not made public, but the UN paid a settlement to Olivet's family and Belgian news reports held an Ethiopian peacekeeper responsible.

Burial and recognition

He was buried on 24 December.

Editorial summary

“Georges Olivet” enters the record as swiss Red Cross delegate. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Georges, Olivet and Swiss can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1927, 1961, 1960—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1927-08-19. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Georges, Olivet and Swiss.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Georges Olivet” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Georges, Olivet and Swiss provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 11, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q124254215. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1927, 1961 and 1960.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Georges Olivet”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Georges Olivet primary sources, Georges Olivet archive and Georges research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Georges Olivet”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Georges Olivet” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.