CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

George Szekeres

Hungarian-Australian mathematician (1911–2005)

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 29, 2026
Entity authorityQ177504 ↗
Source-derived summary

George Szekeres (Hungarian: [ˈsɛkɛrɛʃ]; 29 May 1911 – 28 August 2005), born Szekeres György, was a Hungarian–Australian mathematician. After migrating to Australia after World War II, he worked first for the University of Adelaide, and then the University of New South Wales. He is known for his co-authoring a paper with fellow Hungarian mathematician Paul Erdős known as the "Happy Ending problem", and married mathematician Esther Klein.

Early years and education

Szekeres György was born in Budapest, Hungary, on 29 May 1911.

He received his degree in chemistry at the Royal Joseph University (later Technical University of Budapest). He graduated with a degree in chemical engineering in 1933, having studied only one mathematical course, in calculus.

The so-called "Happy Ending problem" is an example of how mathematics pervaded Szekeres's life. During 1933, George and several other students met frequently, often at the Anonymous statue in City Park, to discuss mathematics. At one of these meetings, Esther Klein proposed the problem: "Given five points in the plane in general position, prove that four of them form a convex quadrilateral." After allowing George, Paul Erdős, and the other students to scratch their heads for some time, Esther explained her proof. Subsequently, George and Paul wrote a paper (1935) that generalises this result; it is regarded as one of the foundational works in the field of combinatorial geometry.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “George Szekeres” is hungarian-Australian mathematician (1911–2005). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through George, Szekeres and Hungarian-Australian, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1911, 2005, 1933, 1935—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1911-05-29. For this dossier, George, Szekeres and Hungarian-Australian is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “hungarian-Australian mathematician (1911–2005)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q177504. VIAF identifies the subject as 121484057. 2 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 1 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1911, 2005, 1933 and 1935.

Critical limits

A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “George Szekeres”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow George Szekeres primary sources, George Szekeres archive and George research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “George Szekeres”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “George Szekeres” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.