CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

George of the Jungle 2

2003 American comedy film

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 20, 2026
Entity authoritySource title only
Source-derived summary

George of the Jungle 2 is a 2003 comedy film and the sequel to the 1997 Disney film George of the Jungle directed by David Grossman and written by Jordan Moffet and starred Thomas Haden Church, Julie Benz, Christina Pickles, Angus T. Jones, Michael Clarke Duncan, John Cleese, Keith Scott and Christopher Showerman in his film debut. Cleese, Church, Miller and Scott reprise their roles from the first film, as does Abdoulaye N'Gom and Lydell M. Cheshier. The sequel focuses on George trying to save Ape Mountain from his evil nemesis Lyle. Released by Buena Vista Home Entertainment, the film released on October 21, 2003 and was filmed in Tallebudgera on the Gold Coast of Queensland, Australia.

Editorial summary

“George of the Jungle 2” enters the record as 2003 American comedy film. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what George, Jungle and American can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA productive route into publication, performance and collection histories when the underlying object or edition remains clearly identified. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2003, 1997—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around George, Jungle and American.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“George of the Jungle 2” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, George, Jungle and American provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Object files, edition statements, performance records and contemporary criticism preserve different stages of the work’s history. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 20, 2026. The first chronological checks are 2003 and 1997.

Critical limits

Later fame can flatten the distinction between original context, subsequent adaptation and institutional collecting history. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “George of the Jungle 2”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow George of the Jungle 2 primary sources, George of the Jungle 2 archive and George research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “George of the Jungle 2”?
  2. Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
  3. How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “George of the Jungle 2” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.