CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Geodeung of Geumgwan Gaya

King of Gaya (- 253)

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 22, 2026
Entity authorityQ496806
Source-derived summary

Geodeung, also called Geodeung Wang, was the king of Gaya, a confederacy of chiefdoms that existed in the Nakdong River valley of Korea during the Three Kingdoms era, from 199 to 259. Legend holds that he was the son of King Suro of Gaya and Suro's queen, Heo Hwang-ok. Legend says also they had in total ten sons. Geodeung Wang was married with Queen Mojong, who was the daughter of Sin Po Ch'onpukyong(泉府卿) and Mojong. Sin Po was a courtier in Heo Hwang-ok's entourage.

Family

Father: King Suro (수로왕; 首露王)

Mother: Heo Hwang-ok (허황옥; 許黃玉)

Wife: Lady Mojeong (모정부인; 慕貞夫人) – daughter of Sin Po (신보; 申輔).

Editorial summary

“Geodeung of Geumgwan Gaya” enters the record as king of Gaya (- 253). Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Geodeung, Geumgwan and Gaya can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current 107-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Geodeung, Geumgwan and Gaya.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Geodeung of Geumgwan Gaya” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Geodeung, Geumgwan and Gaya provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q496806.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Geodeung of Geumgwan Gaya”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Geodeung of Geumgwan Gaya primary sources, Geodeung of Geumgwan Gaya archive and Geodeung research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Geodeung of Geumgwan Gaya”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Geodeung of Geumgwan Gaya” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.