CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Gatesclarkeanini

tribe of insects

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 27, 2025
Entity authorityQ5527142 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Gatesclarkeanini are a tribe of tortrix moths.

Genera

Asymmetrarcha

Atsusina

Gatesclarkeana

Hiroshiinoueana

Ukamenia

References

Further reading

Brown, J.W. 2005: World Catalogue of Insects, volume 5: Tortricidae

M.Horak & F.Komai. 2006. Olethreutinae moths of Australia

Nasu, Y., 2012: New olethreutine moths from Japan (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Olethreutinae). Tinea 22 (1): 12-24.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Gatesclarkeanini” is tribe of insects. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Gatesclarkeanini, tribe and insects, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2005, 2006, 2012—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Gatesclarkeanini, tribe and insects is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “tribe of insects” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 27, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q5527142. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2005, 2006 and 2012.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Gatesclarkeanini”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Gatesclarkeanini primary sources, Gatesclarkeanini archive and Gatesclarkeanini research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Gatesclarkeanini”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Gatesclarkeanini” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.