CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Gasterophilus pecorum

species of insect

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ14117026 ↗
Source-derived summary

Gasterophilus pecorum is a species of botfly within the genus Gasterophilus that is an obligate parasite of horses and other equids.

Gasterophilus pecorum is found in the desert steppe of Xinjiang, China, where it is the most prevalent botfly species. In Kalamaili Nature Reserve (KNR), China, G. pecorum is a major problem for the health of Przewalski's horse, which has been reintroduced in the area. Gasterophilus pecorum has also been observed infecting equids, such as the Persian Onager (Equus hemionus onager). Of the six identified species of Gasterophilus found within the KNR, G. pecorum is responsible for a majority of all botfly infections.

Taxonomy

Larvae

G. pecorum larvae have several larval instars, these larvae move throughout their host's digestive tract while going through these life stages. Similar to other members of the genus Gasterophilus, in their last larval stage G. pecorum have a set of hooked mouth parts, which is used to help attach themselves to their host's gastrointestinal tract. After completing this life stage, the larvae are released via the host's excrement, and it then becomes a pupa then eventually into an adult.

Adults

Adult G. pecorum similar to other members of Gasterophilus can resemble honey bees, as they have dark patches of brown and yellow hairs.

Life cycle

G. pecorum has four main life stages: egg, larvae, pupae, and adult.

Editorial summary

“Gasterophilus pecorum” enters the record as species of insect. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Gasterophilus, pecorum and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current 222-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Gasterophilus, pecorum and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Gasterophilus pecorum” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Gasterophilus, pecorum and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q14117026. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Gasterophilus pecorum”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Gasterophilus pecorum primary sources, Gasterophilus pecorum archive and Gasterophilus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Gasterophilus pecorum”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Gasterophilus pecorum” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.