CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Garden Tomb

antique tomb in Jerusalem, considered by some to be the tomb of Jesus

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ1494672
Source-derived summary

The Garden Tomb (Arabic: بستان قبر المسيح, romanized: Bustān Qabr al-Masīḥ, lit. 'the Garden of the Tomb of Christ'; Hebrew: גן הקבר, romanized: Gan ha-Kéver, lit. 'Garden of the Tomb') is an ancient rock-cut tomb surrounded by a garden, right outside the walls of ancient Jerusalem, that functions as a site of Christian pilgrimage attracting hundreds of thousands of annual visitors, especially Evangelicals and other Protestants, as some Protestant Christians consider it to be the empty tomb where Jesus of Nazareth resurrected. This is in contrast to an older tradition that locates the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus at a site roughly 600 metres (0.37 mi) to the south known as Golgotha and located within the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.

The Garden Tomb and its surrounding gardens are adjacent to a rocky outcrop known as Skull Hill (Arabic: تلة الجمجمة, romanized: Tallat al-Jumjumah; Hebrew: גבעת הגולגולת, romanized: Giv'át ha-Gulgólet). In the mid-nineteenth century, some Christian scholars proposed that Skull Hill is Golgotha, where the Romans crucified Jesus. A few decades later, in 1867, the Garden Tomb was discovered and later proposed to be the tomb of Jesus.

More recently, the Israeli archaeologist Gabriel Barkay points out that the tomb does not contain any features indicative of the 1st century CE, when Jesus was buried, and argues that the tomb is likely to have been created in the 8th–7th centuries BCE. The Italian archeologist Riccardo Lufrani argues instead that it should be dated to the Hellenistic era, the 4th–2nd centuries BCE. The re-use of old tombs was not an uncommon practice in ancient times, but this would seem to contradict the biblical text that speaks of a newly hewn tomb which Joseph of Arimathea made for himself (Matthew 27:57–60, John 19:41).

The organization that owns and maintains the Garden Tomb is a non-denominational charitable trust based in the United Kingdom named The Garden Tomb (Jerusalem) Association, a member of the Evangelical Alliance of Israel and the World Evangelical Alliance. It was formed by a number of evangelical Anglicans from the Church of England in 1885. The association refrains from claiming that the Garden Tomb is the authentic tomb of Jesus, and instead emphasizes the site's utility as a visual aid for the gospel accounts and its function as a place of Christian worship. The site draws hundreds of thousands of annual pilgrims, especially evangelicals and other Protestants.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Garden Tomb” as antique tomb in Jerusalem, considered by some to be the tomb of Jesus. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Garden, Tomb and antique.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1867, 1885—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Garden, Tomb and antique providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Garden Tomb”, the useful work is to connect “antique tomb in Jerusalem, considered by some to be the tomb of Jesus” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1494672. Authority coordinates are 31.784, 35.230. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1867 and 1885.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Garden Tomb”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Garden Tomb primary sources, Garden Tomb archive and Garden research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Garden Tomb”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Garden Tomb” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.