CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Garden City Casino skimming scandal

San Jose, California, white-collar crime

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ135012951 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Garden City Casino Skimming scandal was a six-year-long investigation initially conducted by the Santa Clara County grand jury and the San Jose Police Department and tried in the Santa Clara County superior court between 1981 and 1987 into the skimming perpetrated by twelve Garden City Casino owners and employees. Prosecutors in the Santa Clara County District Attorney's Office unsealed an indictment totaling of 60 felony counts accusing fourteen individuals of criminal conspiracy that included: committing a crime, defraud, violating campaign disclosure laws, filing false tax returns, and perjury. Of those fourteen individuals, twelve pleaded guilty. This scandal was regarded by The Mercury News as "one of the longest-running criminal cases" in Santa Clara County's history.

Background

Criminal proceedings

On May 6, 1987, fourteen employees of Garden City Casino were indicted, by the Santa Clara County grand jury, with sixty total felony counts of Criminal conspiracy, Conspiracy to commit a crime, Conspiracy to defraud, Conspiracy to violate campaign disclosure laws, filing false individual state tax returns, filing fraudulent corporate state tax returns, and perjury. Three of those criminal counts indicted against former president Nicholas J. Dalis, included two counts of attempted grand theft and one count of grand theft. Prosecutors and the San Jose Police Department alleged that the casino skimmed $3.8 million in the last eight years and that the casino owners "reimbursed employees for giving campaign contributions -- a violation of state law". Hours before the arraignment, the California Franchise Tax Board raided the casino and "seized about $200,000 to recover unpaid taxes."

Twelve employees pleaded or were found guilty, and the ownership was barred from renewing their gaming licenses as a result of their criminal convictions. The casino was ordered to, both, pay a $5 million fine and for the convicted owners to sell all their shares by October 1993. Seven out of the twelve employees were sentenced to house arrest and nine out of the twelve defendants were sentenced to community service.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Garden City Casino skimming scandal” as san Jose, California, white-collar crime. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Garden, City and Casino.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1981, 1987, 1993—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Garden, City and Casino providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Garden City Casino skimming scandal”, the useful work is to connect “san Jose, California, white-collar crime” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q135012951. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1981, 1987 and 1993.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Garden City Casino skimming scandal”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Garden City Casino skimming scandal primary sources, Garden City Casino skimming scandal archive and Garden research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Garden City Casino skimming scandal”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Garden City Casino skimming scandal” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.