CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Ganga Pipaliya

village in Madhya Pradesh, India

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 20, 2026
Entity authorityQ24927783 ↗
Source-derived summary

Ganga Pipaliya is a village in the Bhopal district of Madhya Pradesh, India. It is located in the Berasia tehsil.

Demographics

According to the 2011 census of India, Ganga Pipaliya has 246 households. The effective literacy rate (i.e. the literacy rate of population excluding children aged 6 and below) is 72.05%.

Editorial summary

“Ganga Pipaliya” enters the record as village in Madhya Pradesh, India. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Ganga, Pipaliya and village can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA strong orientation record where physical form, institutional use and historical geography need to be read together. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2011—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Ganga, Pipaliya and village.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Ganga Pipaliya” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Ganga, Pipaliya and village provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Maps, plans, fabric surveys and administrative records can establish how the site’s name, extent and function changed over time. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 20, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q24927783. Authority coordinates are 23.545, 77.295. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2011.

Critical limits

Modern boundaries and familiar names can conceal earlier jurisdictions or structures that do not align with the present site. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Ganga Pipaliya”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Ganga Pipaliya primary sources, Ganga Pipaliya archive and Ganga research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ganga Pipaliya”?
  2. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
  3. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Ganga Pipaliya” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.