CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

GT Krush Rebellease Pro Cycling

Dutch cycling team

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 6, 2026
Entity authorityQ28869582 ↗
Source-derived summary

GT Krush Rebellease Pro Cycling is a professional road bicycle racing women's team which participates in elite women's races. The team was established in 2008 as Swabo Ladies Cycling Team, before gaining UCI status for the 2019 season.

The team also runs three development teams, aimed at training the next generation of riders: Swabo Women Development Team, Swabo Women U19 Development Team and Swabo Women U17 Development Team.

Team roster

As of 22 January 2021.

Editorial summary

“GT Krush Rebellease Pro Cycling” enters the record as dutch cycling team. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Krush, Rebellease and Cycling can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2008, 2019, 2021—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Krush, Rebellease and Cycling.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“GT Krush Rebellease Pro Cycling” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Krush, Rebellease and Cycling provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q28869582. The first chronological checks are 2008, 2019 and 2021.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “GT Krush Rebellease Pro Cycling”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow GT Krush Rebellease Pro Cycling primary sources, GT Krush Rebellease Pro Cycling archive and Krush research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “GT Krush Rebellease Pro Cycling”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “GT Krush Rebellease Pro Cycling” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.