George Washington Chavis
Mississippi state legislator
George Washington Chavis (c. 1817 – after 1880) was an American free man of color who served in the Mississippi Legislature. He served in the Mississippi House of Representatives from Warren County in 1874 and 1875.
Biography
Chavis was born circa 1817 in Tennessee; his father was a free man of color who owned a plantation in Warren County, Mississippi.
As of the 1850 United States census, Chavis and his wife and children lived in Copiah County, Mississippi, and he owned one slave. Chavis subsequently moved to Illinois after Mississippi banned "free people of color". Per the 1860 census and 1870 census, he and his family lived in Massac County, Illinois. Chavis returned to Mississippi in the early 1870s.
In 1879, Chavis wrote to Blanche K. Bruce that is it "too late now for much reform" and that he was planning to leave the state because "the old rebs has too much old prenudice that is bound to destroy not only the one that has it but will destroy both soul and body and a nation that will let it rule the government."
His son Jordan Chavis graduated from Alcorn State and became a teacher; he later served as a chaplain in the Spanish–American War.
Chavis's date of death is unknown; he last appeared on the 1880 United States census.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “George Washington Chavis” as mississippi state legislator. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as mississippi state legislator. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q106289688. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1817, 1880, 1874 and 1875.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “George Washington Chavis”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow George Washington Chavis primary sources, George Washington Chavis archive and George research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “George Washington Chavis”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “George Washington Chavis” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.