CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Fundación Doctora Clown

Colombian foundation

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 17, 2024
Entity authorityQ19895106 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Fundación Doctora Clown is a Colombian foundation that works with artists, actors, and musicians to entertain children while they are in the hospital. It was founded in 1998, and it conducts regular visits to hospitals in Bogotá, Bucaramanga, Cali, Cartagena, Barranquilla, Medellín, Pasto and many other cities in Colombia.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Fundación Doctora Clown” as colombian foundation. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1998—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Fundación, Doctora and Clown can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as colombian foundation. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 17, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q19895106. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1998.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Fundación Doctora Clown”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Fundación Doctora Clown primary sources, Fundación Doctora Clown archive and Fundación research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Fundación Doctora Clown”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Fundación Doctora Clown” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.