CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Friedrich Kriehuber

Austrian artist (1834-1871)

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ87788 ↗
Source-derived summary

Friedrich Kriehuber (sometimes Bedřich or Fritz Kriehuber; 7 June 1834 – 12 October 1871) was an Austrian draftsman, lithographer and woodcut artist.

Life and work

Friedrich Kriehuber was born on 7 June 1834 in Vienna. He was the son of Josef Kriehuber, a well-known portrait painter and lithographer. Beginning in 1848, he attended the Academy of Fine Arts, Vienna. Initially, he was a landscape painter but later turned to portraits and, as an employee of his father, lithography.

Many of his works were published by Eduard Hallberger as illustrations for his magazine Über Land und Meer (Over Land and Sea). A year after Kriehuber's death, some of his lithographs appeared in Das jahr 1848. Geschichte der Wiener revolution (a two volume history of the Vienna Uprising) by Heinrich Reschauer and Moritz Smetazko, known as "Moritz Smets" (1828-1890).

He suffered from chronic health problems for most of his life and died on 12 October 1871 in Vienna of a pulmonary disorder at the Austrian Hydrotherapy Institute, shortly after being appointed a professor at the Theresian Military Academy.

Selected lithographs

References

Further reading

Friedrich von Boetticher: Malerwerke des 19.

Editorial summary

“Friedrich Kriehuber” enters the record as austrian artist (1834-1871). Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Friedrich, Kriehuber and Austrian can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1834, 1871, 1848, 1828—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—1836-01-01, 1834-06-07, 1836-06-07—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Friedrich, Kriehuber and Austrian.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Friedrich Kriehuber” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Friedrich, Kriehuber and Austrian provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q87788. VIAF identifies the subject as 49488006. 4 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 1 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1834, 1871, 1848 and 1828.

Critical limits

A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Friedrich Kriehuber”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Friedrich Kriehuber primary sources, Friedrich Kriehuber archive and Friedrich research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Friedrich Kriehuber”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Friedrich Kriehuber” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.