CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Frederic Virtue

British boxer

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 13, 2026
Entity authorityQ5497146
Source-derived summary

Frederic Walter Virtue (5 December 1896 – 4 October 1985) was a British boxer who competed in the 1920 Summer Olympics. He was born in Bermondsey and died in Southwark. In 1920, he was eliminated in the first round of the flyweight class after losing his fight to Ted Zegwaard.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Frederic Virtue” as british boxer. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Frederic, Virtue and British.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1896, 1985, 1920—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1896-12-05. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Frederic, Virtue and British providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Frederic Virtue”, the useful work is to connect “british boxer” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5497146. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1896, 1985 and 1920.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Frederic Virtue”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Frederic Virtue primary sources, Frederic Virtue archive and Frederic research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Frederic Virtue”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Frederic Virtue” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.