CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Isotopes of francium

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ2352365
Source-derived summary

Francium (87Fr) has no stable isotopes, so a standard atomic weight cannot be given. Its most stable isotope is 223Fr with a half-life of 22 minutes, occurring in trace quantities in nature as an intermediate decay product of 235U.

Of elements whose most stable isotopes have been identified with certainty, francium is the most unstable, though astatine is the rarest in nature due to its naturally occurring isotopes having even shorter half-lives and even smaller branching ratios.

In the case of all elements with atomic number 106 (seaborgium) and above, no isotopes have been discovered whose half-life exceeds that of francium-223. However, the isotopes of these elements so far discovered are all on the proton-rich side of beta stability; so there is a strong possibility that some undiscovered isotopes of these elements will have longer half-lives, which could exceed that of francium-223.

List of isotopes

References

Half-life, spin, and isomer data selected from the following sources.

Audi, Georges; Bersillon, Olivier; Blachot, Jean; Wapstra, Aaldert Hendrik (2003), "The NUBASE evaluation of nuclear and decay properties", Nuclear Physics A, 729: 3–128, Bibcode:2003NuPhA.729....3A, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.11.001

National Nuclear Data Center. "NuDat 3.0 database". Brookhaven National Laboratory.

Holden, Norman E. (2004). "11.

Editorial summary

“Isotopes of francium” enters the record as open-knowledge reference entry. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Isotopes, francium and Open-knowledge can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2003, 1016, 2004—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Isotopes, francium and Open-knowledge.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Isotopes of francium” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Isotopes, francium and Open-knowledge provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2352365. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2003, 1016 and 2004.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Isotopes of francium”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Isotopes of francium primary sources, Isotopes of francium archive and Isotopes research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Isotopes of francium”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Isotopes of francium” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.