CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Francis Baskerville

English politician

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 26, 2026
Entity authorityQ5480152
Source-derived summary

Francis Baskerville (born 1615) was an English politician who sat in the House of Commons in 1640.

Baskerville was the son of Thomas Baskerville of Richardston, Wiltshire, and his wife, Joan Lor.

In April 1640, Baskerville was elected as a Member of Parliament for Marlborough in the Short Parliament.

Baskerville married Margaret Glanville, daughter of Sir John Glanville of Broad Hinton, Wiltshire, in April 1635.

Editorial summary

“Francis Baskerville” enters the record as english politician. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Francis, Baskerville and English can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1615, 1640, 1635—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1615-01-01. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Francis, Baskerville and English.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Francis Baskerville” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Francis, Baskerville and English provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5480152. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1615, 1640 and 1635.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Francis Baskerville”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Francis Baskerville primary sources, Francis Baskerville archive and Francis research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Francis Baskerville”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Francis Baskerville” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.