CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Fouga CM.8

French Sailplane

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 28, 2025
Entity authorityQ3079863 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Fouga CM.8 or Castel-Mauboussin CM.8 was a French sailplane of the 1950s, most notable in retrospect due to its place in the development of the Fouga CM.170 Magister jet trainer.

Design and development

The CM.8 was a single-seat aircraft of conventional sailplane design and designed for aerobatics. Two prototypes were built: the CM.8/13, with a 13-metre wingspan and a conventional empennage, and the CM.8/15 with a 15-metre wingspan and a V-tail.

The pleasing performance of these aircraft led to experiments with mounting a small turbojet on the dorsal fuselage, exhausting between the tail fins. The first of these flew on 14 July 1949, powered by a Turbomeca Piméné. Designated the CM.8R this combined the 13-metre wing of the CM.8/13 with the tail of the CM.8/15. Two examples were built, and as experiments progressed in the 1950s, they were fitted with increasingly powerful engines, and increasingly shorter wingspans. A twin-fuselage example was also built as the CM.88 as an engine testbed.

Variants

Fouga CM.8

Fouga CM.8 Acro

Fouga CM.8/13

Fouga CM.8/15

Fouga CM.8/13 Sylphe démotorisé

Fouga CM.8 R13 Cyclone

Fouga CM.8 R13 Sylphe II

Fouga CM.8 R13 Sylphe III

Fouga CM.8 R9.8 Cyclope I

Fouga CM.8 R9.8 Cyclope II

Fouga CM.8 R8.3 Midget

Version intended for air racing, powered by 264 lbf (1.17 kN) Turbomeca Palas engine, with fuselage of Cyclope, and wings of reduced span (7.07 m (23 feet 2 inches)) and area 8.3 m2 (89 sq ft). Small production series (eight – twelve) built.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Fouga CM.8” is french Sailplane. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Fouga, French and Sailplane, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1949—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Fouga, French and Sailplane is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “french Sailplane” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 28, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q3079863. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1949.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Fouga CM.8”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Fouga CM.8 primary sources, Fouga CM.8 archive and Fouga research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Fouga CM.8”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Fouga CM.8” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.