CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Forum Sport

Dutch football club

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 7, 2025
Entity authorityQ2288737
Source-derived summary

Forum Sport is a Dutch football club from Voorburg. Its main squad plays since 2013 in the Eerste Klasse. Homeground is Sportpark 't Loo and its colors are blue.

History

Forum Sport was founded on 1 July 1998 from a merger between DEVJO and SV Voorburg. DEVJO was founded on 15 July 1933, was originally a Christian football club and played on Saturdays. SV Voorburg played on Sundays. Forum Sport stopped Sunday football in 2005.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Forum Sport” as dutch football club. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Forum, Sport and Dutch.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2013, 1998, 1933, 2005—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Forum, Sport and Dutch providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Forum Sport”, the useful work is to connect “dutch football club” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 7, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q2288737. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2013, 1998, 1933 and 2005.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Forum Sport”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Forum Sport primary sources, Forum Sport archive and Forum research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Forum Sport”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Forum Sport” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.