CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Forthassa Gharbia

place in Naâma, Algeria

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 9, 2024
Entity authorityQ15218235 ↗
Source-derived summary

Forthassa Gharbia (or Forthassa Rharbia) is a small settlement in western Algeria near the Moroccan border, to the west of Aïn Séfra. During the French colonial era it was important as a military post.

Forthassa Gharbia is a waterhole on the High Plateaux between the Tell and Saharan Atlas ranges. It lies slightly to the west of a line between Teniet el Sassi and the oasis of Ich, and therefore was technically within Moroccan territory, but in 1904 the boundary between Morocco and Algeria had not been delimited in this region, and there was no protest when the French occupied it.

The French advance post at Forthassa Gharbia was established in March 1904 by Hubert Lyautey to ensure that the Beni Guil, a Moroccan tribe, accepted French rule.

The post closed the dangerous pass of Jebel Grouz, cutting off the Beni Guil from their allies.

By 1904 the pacification had mostly been achieved with little need for fighting.

For some time after establishing their protectorate over Morocco the French considered Forthassa Gharbia to be in Morocco, although the post was manned by Algerian troops.

The troops collected the zekat tax on animals from the Beni Guil, a Moroccan tribe, in the name of the Moroccan government,

and this money was used to maintain the post.

However, eventually the French decided the post was in Algeria, drawing the boundary to the west of it.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Forthassa Gharbia” is place in Naâma, Algeria. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Forthassa, Gharbia and place, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1904—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Forthassa, Gharbia and place is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “place in Naâma, Algeria” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 9, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q15218235. Authority coordinates are 32.842, -1.245. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1904.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Forthassa Gharbia”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Forthassa Gharbia primary sources, Forthassa Gharbia archive and Forthassa research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Forthassa Gharbia”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Forthassa Gharbia” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.