CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Fort Nieuw-Amsterdam

fort near Nieuw-Amsterdam, Suriname

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ2476520 ↗
Source-derived summary

Fort Nieuw-Amsterdam is a fort in Suriname built from 1734 to 1747 at the confluence of the Suriname and Commewijne rivers. It is open to the public as an open-air museum.

History

The necessity of improving the fortifications of the colony of Suriname was underscored when French buccaneers under the leadership of Jacques Cassard attacked the colony in 1712. Fort Sommelsdijk, which was situated further upstream the Commewijne River at its confluence with the Cottica River was fortified for this purpose in 1715, but it was clear something more substantial needed to be done to defend the colony against foreign attacks. It was eventually decided to build a new fort at the confluence of the Suriname and Commewijne rivers. When Fort Nieuw-Amsterdam was completed in 1747, Fort Sommelsdijk was downgraded to a military outpost.

In 1804, the fort was captured by British forces led by Samuel Hood and Charles Green, during the Invasion of Suriname, which was a campaign during the Napoleonic Wars. This battle was notable for being the first usage of Shrapnel shells.

Between 1863 and 1967, the fort was used as a prison. It is the location of the decommissioned lightvessel Suriname-Rivier, which is permanently moored in a wet dock inside the fort.

Editorial summary

“Fort Nieuw-Amsterdam” enters the record as fort near Nieuw-Amsterdam, Suriname. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Fort, Nieuw-Amsterdam and fort can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA valuable geographic starting point for tracing changing names, boundaries, uses and administrative responsibility. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1734, 1747, 1712, 1715—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Fort, Nieuw-Amsterdam and fort.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Fort Nieuw-Amsterdam” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Fort, Nieuw-Amsterdam and fort provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The strongest evidence will usually combine a dated visual record with documents produced by the authority responsible for the place. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2476520. VIAF identifies the subject as 288639447. Authority coordinates are 5.888, -55.092. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1734, 1747, 1712 and 1715.

Critical limits

A single description cannot reconcile every naming convention, rebuilding phase or administrative transfer associated with a place. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Fort Nieuw-Amsterdam”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Fort Nieuw-Amsterdam primary sources, Fort Nieuw-Amsterdam archive and Fort research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Fort Nieuw-Amsterdam”?
  2. Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
  3. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Fort Nieuw-Amsterdam” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.