Fort d'Issy
Open-knowledge reference entry

Fort d'Issy was one of the fortifications of the city of Paris, France, built between 1841 and 1845.
It was one of six forts built to the south of the main wall around the city.
The fort was placed too close to the city to be effective, and had a poor design that did not take into account recent experience of siege warfare.
It was quickly silenced during the Franco-Prussian War of 1870–71.
After the armistice of February 1871 the fort was defended by National Guards of the Paris Commune against the French regular army in April–May 1871.
The defense was irresolute and the fort was soon occupied.
Today the site of the fort is an "eco-district", an ecologically friendly residential area.
Background
In 1814 and 1815 Paris was twice occupied by a coalition of British, Austrian, Russian and Prussian forces at the end of the Napoleonic Wars.
After the restoration of the Bourbon monarchy, and particularly after the July Monarchy came to power in 1830, there was growing demand for construction of fortifications around Paris.
Tension rose during the Oriental Crisis of 1840.
The public source identifies “Fort d'Issy” as open-knowledge reference entry. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Fort, d'Issy and Open-knowledge.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Fort d'Issy”, the useful work is to connect “open-knowledge reference entry” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3078131. Authority coordinates are 48.817, 2.269. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1841, 1845, 1870 and 1871.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Fort d'Issy”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Fort d'Issy primary sources, Fort d'Issy archive and Fort research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Fort d'Issy”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Fort d'Issy” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.