My Lord Chamberlain, His Galliard
piece for lute by John Dowland
"My Lord Chamberlain, His Galliard (an invention for two to play upon one lute)" is a piece by John Dowland for the lute. It was printed in his First Booke of Songes or Ayres (London, 1597). The Lord Chamberlain at the time of publication was George Carey, 2nd Baron Hunsdon who with his wife Elizabeth was the dedicatee of the First Book.
Like many of the compositions in the First Book, the piece uses a dance form, the galliard. The work's description is the first use of the term "invention" referring to a musical work in English. It is the only lute duet, aside from those by Thomas Robinson, published in England. According to Spring, the work "allows the possibility of an intimate embrace" between the two players, who must sit one upon the other's lap. Rather than a being romantic duet, Thurston Dart, who reworked Fellowes' edition of the First Book, suggested that the piece might have been played by father and son, as he concluded that it is easier if one of the players is a child.
Bibliography
Spring, Matthew: The Lute in Britain: A History of the instrument and its music. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “My Lord Chamberlain, His Galliard” is piece for lute by John Dowland. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Lord, Chamberlain and Galliard, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “piece for lute by John Dowland” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6945927. The Library of Congress control number is n80110542. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1597 and 2001.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “My Lord Chamberlain, His Galliard”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow My Lord Chamberlain, His Galliard primary sources, My Lord Chamberlain, His Galliard archive and Lord research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “My Lord Chamberlain, His Galliard”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “My Lord Chamberlain, His Galliard” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.