CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Florida Digital Service

cybersecurity agency in Florida, United States

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ125747827
Source-derived summary

The Florida Digital Service is a government agency created to lead Florida's cybersecurity efforts. In 2020, the agency, modeled after the United States Digital Service, was created by Ron DeSantis based on legislation introduced by Florida Rep. James Grant, who initially led the organization. The Florida Department of Management Services is the parent agency.

In 2021, several top officials departed without giving any notice and the agency, short-staffed, was unable to create a plan to spend the $30 million in funding assigned to cybersecurity measures by lawmakers. By September 2022 only 40 of 70 full-time positions were filled. Grant announced he would step down from the role of Chief Information Officer on July 1, 2023. In April 2024, a law revised the purpose of the agency to be "to lead enterprise information technology and cybersecurity efforts." In August 2024, Warren Sponholtz was named the new Chief Information Officer.

State Senate Bill 7026, introduced in March 2025, would replace the Florida Digital Service (FDS) with a cabinet-level entity known as the Agency for State Systems and Enterprise Technology. The new agency is intended to serve as the enterprise agency for IT governance and is projected to be established by 2028, contingent on the bill's passage.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Florida Digital Service” as cybersecurity agency in Florida, United States. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2020, 2021, 2022, 2023—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2020. The account is most persuasive where Florida, Digital and Service can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as cybersecurity agency in Florida, United States. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q125747827. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Florida Digital Service”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Florida Digital Service primary sources, Florida Digital Service archive and Florida research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Florida Digital Service”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Florida Digital Service” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.