CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Floating–Harbor syndrome

genetic developmental disorder characterized by facial dysmorphism, short stature with delayed bone age, and expressive language delay

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 2, 2026
Entity authorityQ5459852 ↗
Source-derived summary

Floating–Harbor syndrome, also known as Pelletier–Leisti syndrome, is a rare disease with fewer than 50 cases described in the literature. It is usually diagnosed in early childhood and is characterized by the triad of proportionate short stature with delayed bone age, characteristic facial appearance, and delayed speech development. Although its cause is unknown, it is thought to result from genetic mutation, and diagnosis is established by the presence of a heterozygous SRCAP mutation in those with clinical findings of FHS.

Signs and symptoms

Below are the common clinical features of those diagnosed with Floating–Harbor syndrome. Patients will show varying degrees of some or all FHS symptoms. Facial abnormalities are the most defining aspects of those diagnosed with this disease.

Cardinal facial features

Triangular face

Deep-set eyes

Short philtrum

Wide mouth with a thin vermilion border of the upper lip

Long nose with a narrow bridge and broad, bulbous base

Low-set ears

Voice quality and language

Dysarthria and verbal dyspraxia with phoneme imprecision

Hypernasality

High-pitched voices

Severe receptive and expressive language impairment across all domains of function

Bodily features

Significant delay in bone age (-2 SD or greater) with normalization between 6–12 years old

Skeletal anomalies: brachydactyly, broad fingertips or clubbing, clinodactyly, short thumbs, prominent joints, clavicle abnormalities

Short adult stature: for females, maximum height was at the 20th percentile; for males, the maximum height was at the 25th percentile, though male height varied more widely

The differential diagnosis of broad thumbs includes Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome, where they are a cardinal feature. FHS is also in the differential, which logically agrees with the thought that the disease is a result of a mutation in SRCAP, as this gene interacts with CBP.

Behavior

Tantrums during infancy

Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) during school years: impulsivity, inattention, restlessness

Unpredictable, aggressive outbursts

Autistic spectrum disorder (one case)

Asperger syndrome (one case)

Obsessive compulsive disorder (two cases)

Other observations

Intellectual disability: in all cases each individual showed a varying degree of intellectual impairment and learning disability, ranging from borderline normal to moderate intellectual disability

Early entry into puberty is shown in some girls, leading to menorrhagia and irregular periods

Dental problems (caries, malocclusion, dysplastic, small teeth)

Visual impairment

Mechanism

The cause of this condition is unknown but evidence of familial inheritance and sporadic genetic mutation has been linked to cases of FHS. Two possibly familial cases have been reported—one in a mother and son, and the other in a mother and daughter. This suggests an autosomal dominant inheritance but additional cases need to be investigated to establish this. Another report has suggested that the inheritance may be autosomal recessive. In all of these cases, however, the mothers and children were not similarly affected, suggesting a variable clinical expression of the syndrome.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Floating–Harbor syndrome” as genetic developmental disorder characterized by facial dysmorphism, short stature with delayed bone age, and expressive language delay. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 454-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Floating, Harbor and syndrome can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as genetic developmental disorder characterized by facial dysmorphism, short stature with delayed bone age, and expressive language delay. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 2, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5459852. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Floating–Harbor syndrome”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Floating–Harbor syndrome primary sources, Floating–Harbor syndrome archive and Floating research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Floating–Harbor syndrome”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Floating–Harbor syndrome” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.