CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2017 Flint mayoral recall election

American local election

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 24, 2026
Entity authorityQ60528166 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 2017 Flint mayoral recall election took place on November 7, 2017. Incumbent Mayor Karen Weaver ran to retain her seat after opponents, alleging corruption, gathered signatures to force a recall election two years into Weaver's term as Mayor. Seventeen opponents filed to run against Weaver in the election, the most prominent of which was City Councilman Scott Kincaid. Weaver ultimately prevailed in the recall election, winning 53 percent of the vote.

Background

The City of Flint's contract with Republic Services for trash collection expired on June 30, 2016. Prior to the expiration of the contract, Mayor Karen Weaver recommended that the City enter into a $17 million contract with Rizzo Environmental Services for trash and recycling collection, which was $2 million less than Republic's proposal. The City Council rejected the recommendation in a 5–3 vote on June 27, and the city's contract with Republic was extended for a month to allow negotiations to continue. On July 18, the City Council voted down the contract by an 8–1 vote, with City Councilwoman Kate Fields criticizing Rizzo's concealment of its relationship with recalled former Mayor Woodrow Stanley. Trash service was suspended for a day when the contract with Republic expired, prompting City Councilman Scott Kincaid to file a lawsuit against Weaver, which the City Council voted to join. The lawsuit sought to prevent Weaver from using an emergency provision in the purchasing ordinance to award a contract to Rizzo.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “2017 Flint mayoral recall election” is american local election. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Flint, mayoral and recall, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2017, 2016—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Flint, mayoral and recall is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “american local election” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q60528166. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2017 and 2016.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2017 Flint mayoral recall election”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2017 Flint mayoral recall election primary sources, 2017 Flint mayoral recall election archive and Flint research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2017 Flint mayoral recall election”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2017 Flint mayoral recall election” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.