Fractal flame
Fractal functions in mathematics

Fractal flames are a member of the iterated function system class of fractals created by Scott Draves in 1992. Draves' open-source code was later ported into Adobe After Effects graphics software and translated into the Apophysis fractal flame editor.
Fractal flames differ from ordinary iterated function systems in three ways:
Nonlinear functions are iterated in addition to affine transforms.
Log-density display instead of linear or binary (a form of tone mapping)
Color by structure (i.e. by the recursive path taken) instead of monochrome or by density.
The tone mapping and coloring are designed to display as much of the detail of the fractal as possible, which generally results in a more aesthetically pleasing image.
Algorithm
The algorithm consists of two steps: creating a histogram and then rendering the histogram.
Creating the histogram
First, one iterates a set of functions, starting from a randomly chosen point P = (P.x,P.y,P.c), where the third coordinate indicates the current color of the point.
Set of flame functions:
{
F
1
(
x
,
y
)
,
p
1
F
2
(
x
,
y
)
,
p
2
…
F
n
(
x
,
y
)
,
p
n
{\displaystyle {\begin{cases}F_{1}(x,y),\quad p_{1}\\F_{2}(x,y),\quad p_{2}\\\dots \\F_{n}(x,y),\quad p_{n}\end{cases}}}
In each iteration, choose one of the functions above where the probability that Fj is chosen is pj. Then one computes the next iteration of P by applying Fj on (P.x,P.y).
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Fractal flame” is fractal functions in mathematics. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Fractal, flame and functions, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “fractal functions in mathematics” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5477494. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1992.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Fractal flame”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Fractal flame primary sources, Fractal flame archive and Fractal research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Fractal flame”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Fractal flame” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.