CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Firstup

American multinational software company

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 15, 2026
Entity authorityQ97332835
Source-derived summary

Firstup, Inc. is an American multinational software company headquartered in San Francisco, California, that designs, develops and sells workforce communications software. Its platform helps large companies manage communications with employees and partners. Greg Shove and Nicole Alvino founded the company, as SocialChorus, in 2008. As of 2025, Bill Schuh is CEO of Firstup.

History

2008–2013: Founding and early years

Greg Shove and Nicole Alvino met at Stanford Graduate School of Business, where Shove was an advisor in one of Alvino's classes. They formed SocialChorus in 2008. In its early years, the company operated as Halogen Media Group and focused on helping companies run online marketing campaigns. It grew following a Series A round of financing from Kohlberg Ventures in 2009, and in 2011 the company renamed to SocialChorus following a merger with influencer management platform YouCast.

Blogs and social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter were emerging into mainstream culture at the time and large companies were beginning to communicate product releases, company news and promotions with bloggers, customers and employees who expressed an interest in talking about their products and services online.

Editorial summary

“Firstup” enters the record as american multinational software company. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Firstup, American and multinational can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2008, 2025, 2013, 2009—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Firstup, American and multinational.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Firstup” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Firstup, American and multinational provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q97332835. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2008, 2025, 2013 and 2009.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Firstup”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Firstup primary sources, Firstup archive and Firstup research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Firstup”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Firstup” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.