CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Query (complexity)

mapping from structures of one signature to structures of another vocabulary

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 14, 2021
Entity authorityQ7271381
Source-derived summary

In descriptive complexity, a query is a mapping from structures of one signature to structures of another vocabulary. Neil Immerman, in his book Descriptive Complexity, "use[s] the concept of query as the fundamental paradigm of computation" (p. 17).

Given signatures

σ

{\displaystyle \sigma }

and

τ

{\displaystyle \tau }

, we define the set of structures on each language,

STRUC

[

σ

]

{\displaystyle {\mbox{STRUC}}[\sigma ]}

and

STRUC

[

τ

]

{\displaystyle {\mbox{STRUC}}[\tau ]}

. A query is then any mapping

I

:

STRUC

[

σ

]

STRUC

[

τ

]

{\displaystyle I:{\mbox{STRUC}}[\sigma ]\to {\mbox{STRUC}}[\tau ]}

Computational complexity theory can then be phrased in terms of the power of the mathematical logic necessary to express a given query.

Order-independent queries

A query is order-independent if the ordering of objects in the structure does not affect the results of the query. In databases, these queries correspond to generic queries (Immerman 1999, p. 18). A query is order-independent iff

I

(

A

)

I

(

B

)

{\displaystyle I({\mathfrak {A}})\equiv I({\mathfrak {B}})}

for any isomorphic structures

A

{\displaystyle {\mathfrak {A}}}

and

B

{\displaystyle {\mathfrak {B}}}

.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Query (complexity)” is mapping from structures of one signature to structures of another vocabulary. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Query, complexity and mapping, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1999—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Query, complexity and mapping is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “mapping from structures of one signature to structures of another vocabulary” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 14, 2021. The linked authority identifier is Q7271381. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1999.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Query (complexity)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Query (complexity) primary sources, Query (complexity) archive and Query research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Query (complexity)”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Query (complexity)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.