CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Lathagrium cristatum

species of fungus

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ23654994 ↗
Source-derived summary

Lathagrium cristatum, the fingered jelly lichen or fingered rock-jelly, is a species of cyanolichen in the family Collemataceae. Originally described by Carl Linnaeus in 1753, the species has a complex taxonomic history involving numerous synonyms and nomenclatural challenges that were only resolved through formal conservation of the name in 1996. The lichen forms distinctive dark olive-green to blackish rosettes on calcareous rocks, with thin, narrow lobes that have characteristically wavy, toothed margins. It has a widespread distribution across the Northern Hemisphere, occurring in diverse climates from arid lowland deserts to arctic and alpine zones. Like other members of its family, it contains cyanobacteria as its photosynthetic partner, enabling it to fix atmospheric nitrogen. The species typically grows in undisturbed natural habitats on hard limestone or dolomite, often in exposed sites moistened by rain runoff.

Taxonomy

Lathagrium cristatum was originally described by the Swedish taxonomist Carl Linnaeus as Lichen cristatus in his 1753 work Species Plantarum. His protologue provided a new diagnostic phrase-name based entirely on Johann Jacob Dillenius's Historia muscorum, the only work cited, because Linnaeus himself had never seen the species in Sweden. No original specimens exist in the Linnaean Herbarium, and the only original material traceable to the protologue is the Dillenian plate (tab. XIX, fig.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Lathagrium cristatum” as species of fungus. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1753, 1996—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Lathagrium, cristatum and species can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as species of fungus. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q23654994. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1753 and 1996.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Lathagrium cristatum”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Lathagrium cristatum primary sources, Lathagrium cristatum archive and Lathagrium research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lathagrium cristatum”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Lathagrium cristatum” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.