CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Filisoma

genus of worms

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 18, 2026
Entity authorityQ2105446 ↗
Source-derived summary

Filisoma is a genus in Acanthocephala (thorny-headed worms, also known as spiny-headed worms).

Taxonomy

The genus was described by Van Cleave in 1928. The National Center for Biotechnology Information indicates phylogenetic analysis has been published on any Filisoma species.

Description

Filisoma species consist of a proboscis covered in hooks and a trunk.

Species

The genus Filisoma Van Cleave, 1928 contains species.

Filisoma acanthocybii Wang, Wang & Wu, 1993

Filisoma argusum Kaur, Shamal, Chandran, Sharma & Sanil, 2021

Filisoma atropi Wang and Wang, 1988

Filisoma bucerium] Van Cleave, 1940

Filisoma caudatum Costa Fernandes, Amin, Borges & Santos, 2019

Filisoma fidum Van Cleve & Manter, 1947

Filisoma filiformis Weaver & Smales, 2013

Filisoma indicum Van Cleave, 1928

Filisoma inglisi Gupta & Naqvi, 1986

Filisoma longcementglandatus Amin & Nahhas, 1994

Filisoma microcanthi Harada, 1938

Filisoma oplegnathi Wang & Wang, 1988

Filisoma rizalinum Tubangui & Masiluñgan, 1946

Filisoma scatophagusi Datta & Soota, 1962

Distribution

The distribution of Filisoma is determined by that of its hosts.

Hosts

The life cycle of an acanthocephalan consists of three stages beginning when an infective acanthor (development of an egg) is released from the intestines of the definitive host and then ingested by an arthropod, the intermediate host. Although the intermediate hosts of Filisoma are arthropods. When the acanthor molts, the second stage called the acanthella begins. This stage involves penetrating the wall of the mesenteron or the intestine of the intermediate host and growing.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Filisoma” is genus of worms. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Filisoma, genus and worms, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1928, 1993, 2021, 1988—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Filisoma, genus and worms is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “genus of worms” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2105446. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1928, 1993, 2021 and 1988.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Filisoma”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Filisoma primary sources, Filisoma archive and Filisoma research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Filisoma”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Filisoma” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.