CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Fidesz

Hungarian political party

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ387006 ↗
Source-derived summary

Fidesz – Hungarian Civic Alliance is a political party in Hungary led by Viktor Orbán. It is most notable for dominating Hungarian politics from 2010 to 2026, a period known as the Orbán era. Earlier, from 1998 to 2002, it was the senior partner in a conservative coalition government. Founded as a classical liberal party, Fidesz gradually moved to the right and is presently considered a right-wing or far-right party with national conservative, Christian nationalist, right-wing populist, authoritarian, Eurosceptic, and illiberal views.

Fidesz was established in 1988 as the Alliance of Young Democrats (Fiatal Demokraták Szövetsége, shortened to Fidesz), a center-left and liberal activist student movement opposed to state communism. During Hungary's transition to multiparty democracy (Hungarian: rendszerváltás) in 1989-90, the movement became a political party and entered the National Assembly with Orbán at its helm after the 1990 election. Fidesz emerged as the largest parliamentary party after the 1998 election. During this period, it adopted nationalism and saw its popularity stagnate due to corruption scandals. While in opposition between 2002 and 2010, Fidesz formed an electoral alliance with the Christian Democratic People's Party (KDNP), which would eventually become its satellite party.

After winning a parliamentary supermajority in the 2010 election, Fidesz pursued national-conservative, Christian-nationalist, and Eurosceptic policies.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Fidesz” is hungarian political party. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Fidesz, Hungarian and political, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2010, 2026, 1998, 2002—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1988-03-30. For this dossier, Fidesz, Hungarian and political is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “hungarian political party” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q387006. VIAF identifies the subject as 147943512. The Library of Congress control number is n2002097602. 3 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2010, 2026, 1998 and 2002.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Fidesz”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Fidesz primary sources, Fidesz archive and Fidesz research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Fidesz”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Fidesz” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.