CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Ferencz Ambruș

Romanian boxer

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ9259067 ↗
Source-derived summary

Ferencz Ambruș (born 2 March 1930, date of death unknown) was a Romanian light-welterweight boxer. He competed at the 1952 Summer Olympics, but was eliminated in the second bout. He won two Romanian National Amateur Boxing Championship at the light-welterweight division in 1948 and 1949.

Editorial summary

“Ferencz Ambruș” enters the record as romanian boxer. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Ferencz, Ambruș and Romanian can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1930, 1952, 1948, 1949—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1930-03-02. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Ferencz, Ambruș and Romanian.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Ferencz Ambruș” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Ferencz, Ambruș and Romanian provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q9259067. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1930, 1952, 1948 and 1949.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Ferencz Ambruș”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Ferencz Ambruș primary sources, Ferencz Ambruș archive and Ferencz research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ferencz Ambruș”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Ferencz Ambruș” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.