CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Fentonadle

hamlet in Cornwall, England, UK

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 19, 2025
Entity authorityQ5443645 ↗
Source-derived summary

Fentonadle is a hamlet situated 4 miles (6.4 km) south-west from Camelford in Cornwall, England. Fentonadle lies at around 120 metres (390 ft) above sea level in the civil parish of Michaelstow situated on the western side of the River Camel valley and to the north-west of Bodmin Moor.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Fentonadle” is hamlet in Cornwall, England, UK. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Fentonadle, hamlet and Cornwall, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 49-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Fentonadle, hamlet and Cornwall is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “hamlet in Cornwall, England, UK” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 19, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q5443645. Authority coordinates are 50.569, -4.707. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Fentonadle”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Fentonadle primary sources, Fentonadle archive and Fentonadle research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Fentonadle”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Fentonadle” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.