CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Felix Oberholzer-Gee

American academic

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 9, 2025
Entity authorityQ5442287 ↗
Source-derived summary

Felix Oberholzer-Gee is a Swiss academic. He is the Andreas Andresen Professor of Business Administration in the Strategy Unit at Harvard Business School. A member of the faculty since 2003, Professor Oberholzer-Gee received his master's degree, summa cum laude, and his Ph.D. in Economics from the University of Zurich.

File sharing

Oberholzer-Gee and Koleman Strumpf wrote The effect of file sharing on record sales: An empirical analysis, which was published in 2007; and in 2008 was cited during the Pirate Bay trial.

Their analysis indicated that file-sharing of music had negligible impact on CD sales, though this has been disputed by the recording industry and other researchers.

However these critiques were never peer reviewed (unlike the original paper) and the authors have received significant funding from the record industry.

References

Further reading

Oberholzer-Gee, Felix & Strumpf, Koleman (March 2004). "The effect of file sharing on record sales: An empirical analysis Archived 2008-06-13 at the Wayback Machine"

Liebowitz, Stan J. (Sept 2016). "Why the Oberholzer-Gee and Strumpf Paper on File-Sharing is not credible"

Liebowitz, Stan J. (May 2017). "Responding to Oberholzer-Gee and Strumpf's Attempted Defense of Their Piracy Paper"

Liebowitz, Stan J. (May 18, 2017).

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Felix Oberholzer-Gee” as american academic. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2003, 2007, 2008, 2004—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1961-01-01. The account is most persuasive where Felix, Oberholzer-Gee and American can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as american academic. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 9, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q5442287. VIAF identifies the subject as 50083098. The Library of Congress control number is no2002115134. 2 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2003, 2007, 2008 and 2004.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Felix Oberholzer-Gee”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Felix Oberholzer-Gee primary sources, Felix Oberholzer-Gee archive and Felix research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Felix Oberholzer-Gee”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Felix Oberholzer-Gee” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.