Federalist No. 30
Federalist Paper by Alexander Hamilton on taxation
Federalist No. 30, titled "Concerning the General Power of Taxation", is a political essay by Alexander Hamilton and the thirtieth of The Federalist Papers. It was first published in the New-York Packet on December 28, 1787, as the twenty-ninth entry in the series under the pseudonym used for all Federalist Papers, Publius. The essay argued that the national government must have broad powers of taxation to provide for national defense and the public good. It revisited ideas that were first raised in No. 12, and the series continued on the subject of taxation through No. 36.
Federalist No. 30 criticized the system of taxation under the Articles of Confederation, which required the states to levy taxes and provide funding for the national government. Hamilton argued that the national government must be able to levy taxes because there are always further needs for government funding and it would need the power to acquire additional funds in times of war.
“Federalist No. 30” enters the record as federalist Paper by Alexander Hamilton on taxation. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Federalist, Paper and Alexander can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Federalist No. 30” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Federalist, Paper and Alexander provides the most credible route into that argument.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5440601. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1787.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Federalist No. 30”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Federalist No. 30 primary sources, Federalist No. 30 archive and Federalist research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Federalist No. 30”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Federalist No. 30” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.