Federal Kidnapping Act
federal kidnapping statute in the US

Following the Lindbergh kidnapping (the abduction and murder of Charles Lindbergh's toddler son), the United States Congress passed a federal kidnapping statute—known as the Federal Kidnapping Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1201(a)(1) (popularly known as the Lindbergh Law, or Little Lindbergh Law)—which was intended to let federal authorities step in and pursue kidnappers once they had crossed state lines with their victim.
History
The act was first proposed in December 1931 by Missouri Senator Roscoe Conkling Patterson, who cited several recent kidnappings in Missouri and called for a federal solution. Initial resistance to his proposal was based on concerns over funding and state's rights.
Consideration of the law was revived after the kidnapping of Howard Woolverton in late January 1932. Woolverton's kidnapping featured prominently in several newspaper series researched and prepared in the weeks following his abduction, and were quite possibly inspired by it. Two such projects, by Bruce Catton of the Newspaper Enterprise Association and Fred Pasley of the Daily News of New York City, were ready for publication within a day or two of the Lindbergh kidnapping. Both series, which ran in papers across North America, described kidnapping as an existential threat to American life, a singular, growing crime wave in which no one was safe.
Following the discovery of Baby Lindbergh's body not far from his home, the act became law in summer 1932. In 1934, the act was amended to provide exception for parents who abduct their own minor children and made a death sentence possible in cases where the victim was not released unharmed.
The theory behind the Lindbergh Law was that federal law enforcement intervention was necessary because state and local law enforcement officers could not effectively pursue kidnappers across state lines.
“Federal Kidnapping Act” enters the record as federal kidnapping statute in the US. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Federal, Kidnapping and federal can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Federal Kidnapping Act” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Federal, Kidnapping and federal provides the most credible route into that argument.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5440269. VIAF identifies the subject as 174047522. The Library of Congress control number is no2006070057. None of the 2 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1201, 1931, 1932 and 1934.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Federal Kidnapping Act”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Federal Kidnapping Act primary sources, Federal Kidnapping Act archive and Federal research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Federal Kidnapping Act”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Federal Kidnapping Act” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.