Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2019
Open-knowledge reference entry
Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2019 include:
January
5 January - Six people, including two women, were injured in an improvised explosive device (IED) blast in Peshawar. The IED was planted in a car parked next to Sunehri Masjid in Peshawar Cantonment.
6 January - At least nine people were injured in an IED blast in Jan Adda area of Pishin District. The IED planted in a motorcycle targeted a Balochistan Levies vehicle. Another two people, including a security man, were injured in a motorcycle blast near a Frontier Corps vehicle in Panjgur.
9 January - A Karachi-Islamabad RLNG pipeline was targeted by a timed explosive device near Bhong in Rahim Yar Khan District. No casualties were reported as a result of the incident.
29 January - January 2019 Loralai attack - 9 people including 8 policemen and a civilian were killed while 22 others were injured when gunmen and suicide bombers attacked a Deputy Inspector General's (DIG) office. The Tehrik-i-Taliban claimed responsibility for the attack.
February
16 February - Armed men attacked and killed two Frontier Corps in Loralai.
The public source identifies “Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2019” as open-knowledge reference entry. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Terrorist, incidents and Pakistan.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2019”, the useful work is to connect “open-knowledge reference entry” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 4, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q65085900. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2019.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2019”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2019 primary sources, Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2019 archive and Terrorist research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2019”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2019” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.