CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Fathom (art installation)

art installation in Portland, Oregon, U.S

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ131056829 ↗
Source-derived summary

Fathom (stylized as FATHOM) was an underwater-themed, immersive art installation located in Portland, Oregon, United States. The installation launched in February 2024 and closed in July 2025. Fathom showcased the work of approximately 100 artists and volunteers and drew inspiration from other immersive art experiences such as Meow Wolf.

Many of the artworks were previously exhibited at the Portland Winter Light Festival, Burning Man, Symbiosis, and Maker Faire. The interactive nature of Fathom allowed visitors to engage with art pieces through buttons that triggered sounds, lighting, and movement.

Description

Fathom was designed to be fully interactive. According to co-founder Tyler FuQua, visitors received clipboards to engage in "research" that included a scavenger hunt within the space. Unlike traditional art exhibits, where touching is often prohibited, Fathom encouraged tactile exploration of its installations. Chris Herring noted that the design process was influenced by companies like Meow Wolf, with advice emphasizing the importance of creating art for personal enjoyment rather than targeting specific audiences.

History

Fathom was created by founding members — Tyler FuQua, Chris Herring, Jason Hutchinson, Kevin Kearns, and Jean Margaret Thomas — who established the limited liability company Roboto Octopodo to manage the installation's production.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Fathom (art installation)” as art installation in Portland, Oregon, U.S. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2024, 2025—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Fathom, installation and Portland can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as art installation in Portland, Oregon, U.S. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q131056829. Authority coordinates are 45.519, -122.676. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2024 and 2025.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Fathom (art installation)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Fathom (art installation) primary sources, Fathom (art installation) archive and Fathom research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Fathom (art installation)”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Fathom (art installation)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.