Fat Princess Adventures
2015 video game
Fat Princess Adventures is an action role-playing video game developed by Fun Bits Interactive and published by Sony Computer Entertainment for PlayStation 4. It is a sequel to Fat Princess. It was released in North America and Europe on December 5, 2015.
Gameplay
Unlike its predecessor, Fat Princess Adventures is a 4-player, co-op hack-and-slash dungeon crawler. Players can switch between four character classes at any time, Warrior, Mage, Archer, and Engineer, each with their own unique abilities and progression paths. At certain points within the game, the princesses serve as non-playable guides to the players, assisting with magic attacks, healing spells, and turning enemies into cake.
Reception
Fat Princess Adventures has received mixed reviews from critics, scoring 66 out of 100 on Metacritic, and 66.67% on GameRankings.
Mark Steighner of Hardcore Gamer gave the game a 4 out of 5: "Fat Princess was subversive, politically incorrect and unexpectedly complex in its strategy and depth. Fat Princess Adventures trades a little of that depth for a more straightforward, action RPG-focused design". Chris Carter from Destructoid rated the game a 7/10: "Fat Princess Adventures is an enjoyable distraction for hardcore fans of the hack-and-slash genre, but now I just want a proper new Princess game".
“Fat Princess Adventures” enters the record as 2015 video game. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Princess, Adventures and video can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Fat Princess Adventures” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Princess, Adventures and video provides the most credible route into that argument.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 15, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q21775735. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2015.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Fat Princess Adventures”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Fat Princess Adventures primary sources, Fat Princess Adventures archive and Princess research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Fat Princess Adventures”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Fat Princess Adventures” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.